Speaker of the Congress Stanisław Małachowski kicked off proceedings by calling for unity to overcome unexpected obstacles hindering our intentions. He asked the Houses of Congress for their preferred approach to resolve the issues at hand, whether through Representative Tomasz Wawrzecki from Brasław or Duke Kazimierz Sapieha, Speaker of the Polish-Belarussian House of Congress.

Representative Kazimierz Wężyk from Podlasie emphasized the criticality of the current debate and the common desire to do right by the nation. To break ongoing disruptions in our sessions, he proposed a pledge: no member should speak or vote until they swear they haven't received, aren't receiving, nor will receive foreign money.

Representative Tadeusz Matuszewicz from Brześć nad Bugiem expressed confidence in national leaders issuing a people's query as per the common wish. However, he demanded clarity on whether a universal address was ready, when, and about when local congresses (state or county congresses) would be initiated.

Representative Aleksander Zieliński from Nur, supported by reasons given by the Representative from Podlasie, backed the call for the oath's induction, challenging everyone to reveal their true colors. He cited an incident about a guarantee issue, suggesting such integrity cannot be easily discarded.

Representative Wojciech Suchodolski from Chełm and Józef Mierzejewski from Podole agreed on taking the oath, and Wojciech Świętosławski from Volhynia added that further discussions on guarantees should be encouraged.

Representative Piotr Pawlikowski from Mińsk was dismayed at yesterday's session, where the Sacred Laws were drawn into unrelated debates. He warned of dire consequences if the Union doesn't unite behind one instruction for our successors.

Representative Dezydery Leszczyński from Inowrocław reminded the Houses of the most crucial national articles—from taxes to military defense—and urged completing these priorities rather than delving into indefinite elections or other unfinished business. After a repeated call from Representative Tadeusz Matuszewicz, Secretary Jan Łuszczewski presented the universal draft to be sent nationally.

As the debate shifted to scheduling the local congresses, Representative Jan Suchorzewski from Kalisz and Jan Jordan from Kraków weighed in on whether to call for an extraordinary session or handle matters in regular meetings. The focus turned to fast-tracking a national decision on succession via their feedback to current Congress.

Ignacy Potocki, Under Secretary of Internal Affairs for Lithuania-Belarus, discussed the urgency of resolving the national question and requested The President's opinion on setting a date for the regional congresses.

President Stanisław August Poniatowski expressed his eagerness to see the rebirth of the nation through the representatives selected by the people, suggesting that regional congresses take place on September 15 to influence the current Congress debates.

Representative Józef Mierzejewski from Podole and Wojciech Suchodolski from Chełm pushed for immediate deliberation of the universal question, while Michał Zaleski, Representative from Troki, argued that the draft is an order from the Houses and should not be subject to further debate.

Wojciech Świętosławski from Volhynia proclaimed his respect for The President's prerogative to set dates for congresses but insisted that approval is contingent on proper legislation.

Senator Józef Ankwicz from Nowy Sącz presented a "Time for Local Congresses" proposal, aiming for feedback on choosing a successor to the throne. The project set November 16, 1790, for local congress responses.

After a few objections and support, the Congress unanimously agreed to the timeline. Then, Representative Tadeusz Matuszewicz raised concerns about the overwhelming amount of unfinished business, prompting brief further debate, which culminated in the decision to table the matter for subsequent discussion.

After some deliberation, the session was adjourned until the following Monday.

Topics: Stanisław Małachowski and Sejm obstruction; oaths of deputies and non-acceptance of foreign funds; national appeal and local assembly dates; debates on government form and Cardinal Laws; question of throne succession and free elections; national expenses and funding needs, as well as army completion; throne succession and national consent; Magistrature project and parliamentary legislation; role of King Stanisław August Poniatowski in setting assembly dates; Liberum Veto and abolition of unfinished parliamentary laws;