After the arrival of Mister President, Speaker Stanisław Małachowski brought up from yesterday's session the draft proposal from the Representative of Oshmiany, which sparked a debate. Supporters of the addition proposed by the Representative of Volhynia argued for setting a definitive end date for the current Congress no later than the last day of June 1792, while opponents maintained that it would be inappropriate to tie the hands of future Representatives who may have new instructions and because predicting political circumstances is challenging.

Thus, Secretary Jan Łuszczewski read aloud the proposal from Oshmiany without the addendum, leading to a division of opinions.

Representative Wojciech Świętosławski from Volhynia stood in opposition, wanting to incorporate his amendment.

Representative Paweł Grabowski from Volkovysk expressed his desire for a decisive resolution to the ongoing draft, suggesting that disputed points should be settled by a vote.

The next point of contention revolved around the amendment proposed by Representative of Volhynia, intended to ensure the freedom of the nation and assert that the current Congress should not usurp powers beyond the specified timeframe without significant reasons.

Meanwhile, Józef Kociełł from Oshmiany explained that his project and the addendum proposed by the Representative from Volhynia should be considered separately and, if unanimity is not reached, a vote should decide the outcome.

Prince Adam Czartoryski from Lublin suggested that since both the original proposal and the addition aimed to reassure the nation that the Congress did not intend to dictate indefinitely, they could be approved together, though ideally without necessitating a vote.

Despite efforts to reach unanimity, there was no consensus as some Members of Congress argued for and against the addition proposed by the Representative of Volhynia, leading to a vote.

The vote revealed a majority in favor of including the amendment with the proposal, which would give the nation and Mister President a timeline for the current Congress.

Then, Secretary Jan Łuszczewski formalized the amended proposal into law, which reads as follows: "In light of the indispensability of the current needs of The Union, it was necessary to prolong the duration of the current Congress and to adjust the schedule for the local Congresses accordingly."

In financial discussions, Under Secretary of the Treasury Roch Kossowski from Poland-Ukraine reported ongoing negotiations for a substantial loan intended to support The Union's Treasury, outlining the terms agreed upon with a partnership in the Netherlands and seeking congressional ratification.

On the topic of equal financial burdens, Representative Fryderyk Moszyński from Bracław argued that the Poland-Ukraine Treasury should not shoulder the interest payments alone and that the Lithuania-Belarus Treasury should also contribute.

Under Secretary of the Treasury Antoni Dziekoński from Lithuania-Belarus assured that although Lithuania-Belarus was not flush with funds, it attempted to secure half of the needed loan, fulfilling military payments with the rest expected from taxes.

The Congress unanimously ratified the project confirming the loan agreement for 10 million.

Later, Prince Adam Czartoryski proposed to compensate Secretary of the Congress Jan Łuszczewski for his two-year service, with some debate over the prudent amount, ultimately deciding on 50,000.

There was further deliberation on compensating the staff of the Secretariat of the Congress, resulting in an allocation of 20,000, and discussion on a special remuneration for Delagate Turski, which was postponed to a future session.

The session was concluded, with the next meeting scheduled for the following Tuesday.

Topics: Bill on concluding the Sejm's work; Dates for convocation of the relation sejmiks; Efforts of the Crown Treasury Commission and credit negotiations; Matter of ratifying the loan agreement; Proposals for compensating the work of Sejm officials; Regulating the affairs of the Sejm chancellery; Delegation against the Decreed Adam; Opposition and support for projects;