Promptly arriving at the Senate, The President, Mister Stanisław August Poniatowski initiated the session, followed by Speaker of the House Stanisław Małachowski announcing the day's agenda, noting the intersection of joy and sorrow within recent proceedings. Despite previous session's gratitude towards the President for his financial assistance, the follow-up session ended in vain when no consensus was reached on a gratitude project. Thus, Secretary Jan Łuszczewski was summoned to read a decision-making project.

Before the reading, Representative Ignacy Krzucki from the Ukraine region urged greater action from the participants. Following the project reading, a debate ensued. Senator Jacek Jezierski from Łuków noted the small attendance and pushed to delay decisions until more senators could partake, emphasizing that the issue doesn't lie with the treasury but with the decisions made by the cabinet.

Representative Antoni Ledóchowski from Chernihiv argued for swift approval of the palace purchase, while Representative Tomasz Nowowiejski from Wyszogród suggested resolving the matter either at the examination of the cabinet or through a proposal vote. Tadeusz Kościałkowski from Vilkomir argued against harsh reprimands, advocating for moving past the matter and focusing on reassembling the 'house of the nation.'

Despite opposition from Franciszek Kietliński from Sandomierz, Under Secretary of the Treasury for Poland-Ukraine Ignacy Potocki announced the signing of the current session's Confederation by Senator Franciszek Sapieha from Smoleńsk, a recent addition, who pledged loyalty to the King and devotion to national prosperity. Notably, he underlined the importance of preventing future transgressions by setting proper examples.

Senator Adam Rzewuski from Vitebsk expressed gratitude to the President for preserving his recent appointment and stressed that national good supersedes individual property interests. Senator Piotr Ożarowski from Wojnicz emphasized the need to act against the core of the issue, suggesting clarity in the project regarding the palace's resale. Albin Skórkowski agreed to withdraw his own project proposal in favor of Kazimierz Plater's senatorial proposal, requesting only some alterations to better recognize virtue, which he deems essential for the nation's standing.

The President supported commending the individuals responsible for managing the palace sale, although without tarnishing other officials. Representative Pius Kiciński from Liw requested an amendment about the legality of the palace's purchase, and Jan Suchorzewski from Kalisz insisted on the importance of setting an example through punishment, not just for the past but as a lesson for future generations.

Representative Tadeusz Matuszewicz from Brest-Litovsk argued for progressing the nation instead of dwelling on past disputes, promoting either alignment with the King's leniency or instituting proportionate punishment only after appropriate trials.

With no consensus on Jacek Jezierski's project, Speaker Stanisław Małachowski proposed a vote on its acceptance. Subsequently, Ignacy Krzucki proposed withholding all clearance decisions surrounding the palace purchase until a comprehensive review of all financial transactions involved was completed. Kazimierz Sapieha, Speaker of the Lithuanian Confederation, argued for simple resolution: either grant forgiveness or formulate props accordingly.

Following further discussions, it was agreed that efficient resolutions were paramount and the project for the palace sale was accepted with a majority vote, deciding for its resale within two years. After additional debate, it was decided to exempt those involved in the initial purchase from liability.

The session concluded with the reading of the complete law regarding the resale of the palace, highlighting the abrogation of the 1763 Constitution concerning its purchase. The act stated the palace, along with its state and furnishings, must be resold within two years without harming the treasury or funds expended for the initial purchase. Furthermore, those involved in the initial purchase were exonerated from liability.

Note: This report exemplifies the day's themes of property management, fiscal responsibility, and the importance of virtue in governance in the context of 18th-century Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth politics. Discussions reflect a complex intersection of personal, local, and national interests set against the backdrop of legislative processes and the principles of collective decision-making and accountability.

Topics: Great Sejm; King Stanisław August Poniatowski; Sejm Marshal Stanisław Małachowski; Royal Generosity; State Treasury; Purchase of Bryłowski Palace; Parliamentary Debates; Stanisław Małachowski; Ignacy Krzucki; Session Contents; Decision Project; Secretary Jan Łuszczewski; Budgetary Discipline; Legal Regulation; Personal Freedom; Ignacy Potocki; Kazimierz Sapieha; Franciszek Ksawery Branicki; Criminal Law; Treasury Commission;