In the absence of Mister President, Speaker Stanisław Małachowski passionately urged unity among the Representatives. He lamented the reluctance witnessed in decision-making, attributing it to human nature, as oftentimes noble intentions may fail to materialize. He emphasized his preference for consensus and expressed averse sentiments toward having to cast a tie-breaking vote. With prospects of opening today's session, he awaited the Houses' indications on when the recently added Polish-Ukrainian Representatives would join the current assembly.

Representative Benedykt Hulewicz from Volhynia stated that a law proposal, particularly concerning the rights secured by suspensions, should be expedited when its intention of service to the nation might not correspond with the public good. He mentioned a proposed clause read under "Condition on Suspensions," which indicated that neither Senators nor Representatives would have the right of suspension but, similarly, a criminal or public condemnation would not prevent someone from voting.

Many voices emerged in response, with Representative Onufry Oborski from Liw having already introduced a similar proposal presently under consideration.

Representative Mateusz Butrymowicz from Pinsk expressed his distress over the negative influence of multiplying manifestos, even if they may be driven by sincere intentions to aid the nation. He questioned who in The Union has been wronged and warned against internal dissent, which can be manipulated by foreign powers to divide the nation and gain dominance.

Representative Wojciech Świętosławski from Volhynia rebuked the suggestion that his manifesto supported foreign interests, insisting his only aim was to serve God and the nation.

The Congress then debated whether to accept the amendment from the Volhynian Representatives that basically called for Senators who withdraw from their duties to be replaced. Secretary Jan Łuszczewski noted the law on prorogation of the current Congress, followed by the support for the amendments by certain members.

Representative Tomasz Wawrzecki from Brasław argued that these amendments brought unnecessary complexity and potential legal disputes within The Union, urging colleagues to reject them.

Despite various positions and discussions, the vote results were clear: Senate and The Cabinet 4 affirmative, 10 negative; from the House of Representatives 14 affirmative, 52 negative; in total 18 affirmative, 62 negative—confirming the rejection of the contested amendment.

Following the dismissal of the amendment, Speaker Małachowski agreed with the House to designate December 16th of the current year for the newly-elected Representatives to join the present assembly.

Deliberations continued regarding instructive proposals and preconditions for public service eligibility, but the session was suspended until the next scheduled meeting on Monday to facilitate further discussions on these matters.

As Congress reconvenes, matters of national significance and the very fabric of The Union's governance are once again under keen scrutiny and vigorous debate. The complex interplay of law, passion, and politics in this transformative period continues to shape the future of the Poland-Ukraine, Lithuania-Belarus, and Latvia within The Union.

Topics: Sejm Marshal Stanisław Małachowski; Deputy Benedykt Hulewicz; Condition on Suspens Project; Deputy Onufry Oborski; Deputy Mateusz Butrymowicz; Political Manifestos; Internal Dissent; Deputy Wojciech Świętosławski; Deputy Tomasz Wawrzecki; Prince Kazimierz Sapieha; Marshal of the Lithuanian Confederation; Addendum to Law; Alternative for Prussian Lithuania; Project on Sejm Session Form; Project on Returning Deputy Election Prerogative; Condition in Sejmik Voting; Sejm Session;